|
How do you think the recent election results will affect U.S. agriculture?
|
|
|
Food safety bill draws opposition
By Derrek Sigler, Assistant Editor
|
 |
|
|
When the U.S. Senate voted 74-25 to limit debate on S. 510, the Food Safety Modernization Act, it cleared the way for a final vote, where it is expected to pass. While no timetable for when that could occur has been set, many feel it will be soon. This has touched off a fury of activity from groups who oppose the bill.
The bill would give FDA broad powers over recalls, increase the rate of plant inspections and boost access to food facility records. The U.S. House of Representatives passed a similar version of food reform legislation in July 2009.
While all agree there is a need for an overhaul of food safety laws, some feel this bill is not the answer.
"Unfortunately, we must now oppose (the food safety bill) because recent changes to the bill are not in keeping with our fundamental position of risk- and science-based food safety efforts," said Bryan Silbermann, president and CEO of the Produce Marketing Association (PMA). "An amendment that was added exempts processors or farmers who meet certain criteria unrelated to risk. If this were enacted, federal regulation would apply based on where the food is sold and how much it earns – neither of which are risk factors."
PMA said the amendment that exempts these small facilities would hurt small growers and processors, causing them to lose market opportunities.
Another concern is that the amendment weakens consumer protections because many products will not be subject to the new safety rules.
"Consumer confidence is essential to our industry, and having national safety standards for all is critical to building that confidence," Silbermann said.
 |
 
 
 |
