Jan 10, 2022USITC report cites effect of imports on US seasonal cucumber market
The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) on Jan. 7 released its report concerning the effect of imports on the U.S. seasonal cucumber market, with a focus on the U.S. Southeast region.
The investigation, Cucumbers: Effect of Imports on U.S. Seasonal Markets, with a Focus on the U.S. Southeast, was requested by the United States Trade Representative in a letter received on December 7, 2020.
As requested, the USITC, an independent, nonpartisan federal agency, assessed the effect of imports on the domestic seasonal market for cucumbers, with a particular focus on production and competitiveness of cucumbers grown in the U.S. Southeast.
The USITC findings include:
- Between 2015 and 2020, the period covered by the investigation, cucumber production in the United States fell from approximately 826,000 metric tons (mt) to 636,000 mt, while U.S. domestic market share fell from around half to about 40 percent. At the same time, apparent consumption of cucumbers in the United States increased by 24.3 percent.
- The U.S. fresh market cucumber industry is a high-cost producer of somewhat differentiated products, supplying primarily American slicer cucumbers, at both the national level and specifically within the U.S. Southeast. The U.S. industry faces high costs of production, weather-related volatility, and pest pressures that limit competitiveness, particularly in the U.S. Southeast.
- Mexico is a competitive, lower-cost supplier of highly differentiated products, including American slicer cucumbers, and several premium varieties. Mexico has a reputation for consistently high product quality and preferential packing and sorting made possible with protected agriculture and low wage rates.
- Canada is a high-cost supplier of highly differentiated, premium products, mainly greenhouse-grown English cucumbers. High-technology greenhouses in Canada facilitate production of more delicate premium varieties, consistent quality, and greater yields, as well as an extended growing season.
- Available price data show that prices for domestic and imported cucumbers are often very similar and tend to follow similar trends.
- Absent above-average increases in U.S. imports of cucumbers from Mexico from 2008 to 2020, the USITC’s economic model estimates that import prices would have been higher, leading to a shift towards consumption of domestic cucumbers and increased U.S. production, revenue, and operating income in 2015-20.
Cucumbers: Effect of Imports on U.S. Seasonal Markets, with a Focus on the U.S. Southeast (Investigation No. 332-583, USITC Publication 5268, December 2021) is available on the USITC’s Internet site at https://www.usitc.gov/publications/332/pub5268.pdf. The modeling underlying the analyses associated with this report is available at https://www.usitc.gov/publications/332.
USITC general fact-finding investigations, such as this one, cover matters related to tariffs or trade and are generally conducted at the request of the U.S. Trade Representative, the House Committee on Ways and Means, or the Senate Committee on Finance. The resulting report conveys the Commission’s objective findings and independent analyses on the subjects investigated.
The commission makes no recommendations on policy or other matters in its general fact-finding reports. Upon completion of each investigation, the USITC submits its findings and analyses to the requester. General fact-finding investigation reports are subsequently released to the public, unless they are classified by the requester for national security reasons.
- As its starting point, the ITC confirms that U.S. import volumes of Mexican cucumbers and squash have been surging, particularly in recent years – a trend shown in other economic studies to be repeating itself across a broad range of Mexican fruit and vegetable shipments to the U.S. market.
- The report finds, over a five-year period, skyrocketing imports of Mexican cucumbers and squash have reduced domestic output by a total of 567,000 metric tons (mt) and slashed domestic revenue by nearly $500 million.
- Absent above-average increases in U.S. imports of cucumbers and squash from Mexico between 2009 and 2019, the USITC’s economic model estimates that import prices would have been higher, leading to a shift toward consumption of domestic cucumbers and squash, and increased U.S. production, revenue, and operating income in 2015–20.
- Although not addressed in the ITC reports, a large number of other U.S. perishable produce sectors have sustained similar, if not greater, harm due to Mexico’s unrelenting volume increases. In the bell pepper sector, for example, Mexico’s shipment increases of 12% a year from 2015 to 2019 caused Florida bell pepper growers to suffer lost cash receipts of over $150 million a year over that period. (see FDACS 2020 report)
- “Bell pepper import volume increased by 742 percent to 127 million pounds in the summers of 2018–20 from 15 million pounds in the summers of 2008–10. Meanwhile, cucumber imports increased 156 percent to 223 million pounds from 87 million pounds over the same period; squash imports increased 105 percent to 69 million pounds from 34 million pounds; and snap bean import volume increased by 204 percent to 15 million pounds from 5 million pounds.” (see USDA Economic Research Service report)
- See statements from Florida Agriculture Commissioner Nikki Fried and U.S. Senator Rubio
Florida Fruit & Vegetable Association (FFVA) Statement on ITC Report on Cucumber, Squash Imports
Jan. 14, 2022
For decades, unfair trade practices from Mexico and other foreign sources have caused immense harm to produce growers in Florida and across the country. The findings revealed in the recent reports from the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) on the effect of cucumber and squash imports on American farmers unfortunately confirm what other studies have shown and what we see in the field every day: Trade relief is urgently needed to protect American food security.
In fact, these reports support what economists and the industry have said all along, surging volumes of fresh fruits and vegetables imported from Mexico have impacted domestic production, U.S. jobs and more over the last several years. Mexico’s exports have been supercharged by unfair, race-to-the-bottom Mexican pricing, two decades of Mexican Government funding for protected agriculture, agricultural equipment and more, and Mexican wage rates barely one tenth of those in the United States.
It’s a story that has been told time and time again, study after study; yet, Mexican imports continue to cripple growers of fruits and vegetables in Florida and continued inaction by the federal government is causing further devastation.
Other Florida produce sectors, including bell peppers, are also facing harmful impacts and a highly uncertain future due to unfair imports. Two recent reports from the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services and the U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service have documented the extraordinary challenges that domestic growers are experiencing amidst surging imports from Mexico.
Put simply, our U.S.-grown food supply is at risk. While we commend the International Trade Commission for working to help solve this longstanding and growing threat to the Southeast produce industry, now is the time to act. Immediate, effective, swift relief is needed to give our Florida produce growers a future and ensure that a U.S.-grown produce supply is available to American families during the fall, winter and spring months of the year.